Law links and verification status · Blank forms. Citation links are generated from extracted text; unverified links, image-only pages and incomplete citations require review. Reference-book links open publisher resources, not exact definitions.

Pages from Pima county action Judge Hinderaker

PDF page numbers count from the first file page; printed labels may differ.

Open document online · Download source file

PIMA COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS COURT
STATE OF ARIZONA
Case No:
Judicial Notice of Legal Authority & 
Oath Requirement  
Chris Magis Nero, Private Attorney General, 
Article IV Status 
Claimant
VS
 John C. Hinderaker, acting as de facto federal 
judge 
Defendant
Name: CHRISTOPHER KARLS SISNEROS ESTATE, 
Chris Magis Nero,
ATTORNEY IN FACT CAF # 0316-02940R 
Address: 2549 N. SAN CARLOS PL.
City, State, Zip: TUCSON, AZ [85712]
Phone No.: (520) 612-9797
TO: All Parties and Respondents in this Matter, including John C. Hinderaker, acting as 
federal judge
You are hereby placed on JUDICIAL NOTICE of the following federal statutes, constitutional 
provisions, and binding case law that govern the requirements and consequences concerning public 
officers operating without a lawfully filed Oath of Office:
1. 5 U.S.C. § 3331: Requires all federal officers to execute a valid Oath of Office prior to assuming
duties.
2. 5 U.S.C. § 2906: Requires the oath to be filed and available for public inspection.
3. Article VI, U.S. Constitution: Declares all judicial officers must be bound by oath to support the
Constitution.
violation of
his constitutional right to be heard.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
4. Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886): An unconstitutional act is not law; it is as
inoperative as though it had never been passed.
5. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803): Any law repugnant to the Constitution is void.
6. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986: Provides remedy for deprivation of rights under color of law.
7. Estoppel by Silence: Failure to rebut or produce upon lawful demand constitutes default and tacit
agreement.
8. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803): Any act repugnant to the Constitution is void.
9. 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Provides civil remedy for deprivation of constitutional rights under color of law.
10. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986: Holds liable those who conspire to obstruct justice or neglect their duty
to prevent such acts.
11. Estoppel by silence: Silence where there is a duty to speak operates as fraud.
The Respondent’s failure to produce lawful documentation, as demanded in the accompanying
Verified Claim and Subpoena Duces Tecum, shall be construed as a confession of de facto status and
abandonment of office.
Chris Magis Nero, Private Attorney General, Holder in Due Course, Article IV Authority
An official who acts without lawful appointment or oath is a usurper with no legal authority.
This Judicial Notice is filed in support of the Verified Claim for Declaratory Relief and Subpoena
Duces Tecum served upon John C. Hinderaker. Any further attempt to operate in judicial capacity
without producing a lawful oath and bonding instrument will be regarded as an intentional and
knowing fraud upon the People.
Respectfully submitted and noticed on this ___ day of _____________, 2025.
By: ___________________________________________________________
      Chris Magis Nero
      
Private Attorney General
      Executor in Fact
      Article IV Authority
25 April

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
3
COPIES of the foregoing filed, emailed or 
hand-delivered this 25th day of April, 2025, 
with:
PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 110 
West Congress Street. 
Tucson, AZ 85701

Affidavit of Article IV 
Standing & Authority 
In the Matter of the Claim of 
Chris Magis Nero, Private
 Attorney General 
I, Chris Magis Nero, hereby solemnly affirm and declare the following facts are true, 
correct, and based upon firsthand knowledge, and I do so under the Constitution for the United 
States, Article IV,
 Section 4, and under penalty of perjury: 
1. I am a Private Attorney General and Execut or in Fact for t he trust interest and public
accountability of We the 
People.
2. My authority ari
ses directly from Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution a nd is
supported by statutes including 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986;  and case law such as Marbury v.
Madison and Norton v. Shelby  County.
3. I
 am asserting standing in this matter to compel the production of lawful credentials and a filed
Oath o
f Office from one John C. Hinderaker, who has acted as a federal judge without producing
such lawful qualifications upon 
demand.
4. The Constitution mandates that
 all officers of the United States, including judges, shall be
bound by Oath or Affirmation to support it (Article VI).
5.
I have suffered direct and repeated injury in fact due to t he Defendant's pattern of judicial
obstruction, refusal of remedy, and protection of corporat e piracy  against the People.
6. I
 operate 
under Divine Trust and Sacred Duty to restore balance, enforce justice,  and compel
accountability through all peaceful and lawful means.
I affirm that this Affidavit is submitted in good faith, under constitutional mandate, and 
under m y sacred bond to truth, justice, and lawful  remedy. 
Executed this ___ day of ___________, 2025. 
By: _______________________________________ 
       Chris Magis Nero 
   Private Att orney General 
       
Executor in Fact
       Holder in Due Course
25 April