Law links and verification status · Blank forms. Citation links are generated from extracted text; unverified links, image-only pages and incomplete citations require review. Reference-book links open publisher resources, not exact definitions.

WHAT IS THE UNITED STATES

PDF page numbers count from the first file page; printed labels may differ.

Open document online · Download source file

WHAT IS THE UNITED STATES 
More Forbidden History 
Based on the comments and behavior of people all over North America, as it is known, the 
United States, Inc. is revered (dare we say worshiped) unlike any other corporation on the soil in 
the Western Hemisphere of planet Earth, commonly referred to as America. The reasons for this 
are many, but few of them have to do with anything remotely dealing with truth and reality. The 
majority of those who call themselves, unwittingly, "Americans," know very little about any real 
history of the United States, including the nature of the incident that sparked the War for 
Independence and the true outcome of that war. As you will discover below, it was not about the 
tax on tea. Our heads are filled with revisionist history by the members of the social compact that 
control the centers of public education; within or around the locale of the social compact known 
as the United States. We have continually been redacted to encourage worship, adoration, and 
subservience to government authority. All their school teachers out there who have ever tried to 
deviate from the "accepted" instructional materials in their controlled government schools, know 
what I mean-if you didn't toe the line you were forced into retirement. 
What would you think if your friends and neighbors started a cult following after McDonalds 
Corporation? What if on every anniversary since the founding of McDonalds, they gathered 
together to have a barbecue and shoot off fireworks because they thought that Big Macs set them 
free; or took special days off during the year to celebrate Ronald McDonald's birthday and 
carved busts of Ronald at Mount Rushmore to honor him? They would fly the McDonalds 
corporate flag outside their homes and paste stickers of the flag on their vehicles. What if every 
time Executives for McDonalds ran for office, and sent in campaign contributions for their 
favorite candidate? Periodically they might even call on the officers of the corporation to solve 
problems that they were experiencing in their daily lives. 
Whereas this sounds sacrilegious, absurd, and may even appear to stretch the bounds of making 
an appropriate analogy, it is no less valid or logical. In fact, if it weren't for certain unrevealed 
contracts, and a whole lot of brai n washing , United States Inc., would have no more influence, 
power, or jurisdiction over you than McDonalds, IBM, General Motors, or for that matter, any 
other corporation. America has been under an evolving military occupation since 18 71. The flag 
that is flown around the so-called nation in public places, and by people who celebrate the 
occupation, is the war flag of United States. If there were such a thing as a Peace-time flag, it is 
presumed that it would be a neutral, white banner/flag and no other -such as the type of flag that 
is commonly referred to as a "Truce Flag." 
Notice that the title of this essay doesn't include the word "THE." Just as General Motors 
doesn't imply a plural number of motors, United States does not imply a plural number of 
states-there is nothing plural about the contemporary use of the term. United States is a singular 
proper noun, and correct usage does not include the antecedent definite article the. United states 
is a corporate trade name, like General Motors, and identifies a corporation, albeit federal and 
municipal, but a corporation nevertheless. Just as proper English doesn't include "the Canada, 
"the Finland, or "the Egypt", it likewise does not include "the United States." A far more 
REDEM PTIO N MANUA L - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 11 4 

accurate indicator would be the State of United States. We read of the "State of Great Britain" in 
the Declaration of Independence. We hear of the "State of Israel" in the news. The proper recital 
of the name "United States," identifies the for-profit, bankrupt, commercial enterprise in 
Washington, DC, presently managed by the receiver in bankruptcy, Secretary of the Treasury of 
Puerto Rico, a.k.a., Secretary of the Treasury. The United States is a slyly concocted solecism (a 
violation of grammatical rules or of the approved idiomatic usage of language) that plants in the 
mind the notion that its identity is merged with the states, when in fact it is foreign to the 
Compact Party States. 
To fully answer the question: What is the United States , it's forbidden history and the very 
presumption for supporting it-that we are free, must first be examined. We will forego our 
opinions for the moment, and examine the record. If you sincerely believe that you are free from 
bondage (because you can't see, hear, taste, smell or touch it), you will understand after 
completing this reading that your awareness of this possibility is not a necessary condition for its 
existence. Contrary to popular opinion, all that those who fought and died for in the War for 
Independence was rendered null and void just a few short years after the battle ended. The 
British Soldiers were recalled, but the Bankers were not. The so-called United States is but a 
tool-a Trojan horse, if you will (and you are the subject of those who control it), for the Money 
Kings (the Ancient Money-Changers of Modem-day Money Mechanics). 
As a backdrop to the so-called American Revolution, here is a brief overview of the economic 
forces that were being unleashed in Britain around the time of the revolution. It provides 
important background and insight for you to understand that the Money Kings use everyone and 
everything as pawns, including governments, in a world game of Monopoly. They never operate 
out in the light of day. They prefer anonymity-you can only know them through their agents 
and their state apparatus of their countries they control[.] The following nine paragraphs 
examine their methods of operation (modus operandi) and the strategies behind them. The 
economic juggernaut these Money Kings set in motion toppled everything in its wake, including 
the fledgling new republic. Ask yourself while you read them, do you see evidence of these 
same practices operating in your world today? 
The Money Power of the World entered upon a new and grander era of development when steam 
was applied to manufactures. In 17 74, Mr. Watt perfected the steam engine. This new servant of 
man, mightier than the Genii of oriental fable, was at once set to work propelling manufactures. 
The power loom, the spinning Jenny and the cotton gin were soon afterward invented, giving a 
great impulse to the steam manufacturing industry. 
The conditions of the time threw steam manufactures entirely into the hands of the London 
Money Power. Great Britain was the only country in Europe which had coal and iron for steam 
purposes. The capitalists of the East India Company were the only people in the world with 
capital to engage in the new industry. The great trading companies of other countries had been 
broken down by British conquests. Enriched by the trade of the Orient and the Tropics, these 
London capitalists at once seized the opportunity events offered them (chance serves a prepared 
mind) and embarked energetically in steam manufactures. 
The East India Company, as such, did not engage in these manufactures. All the stockholders 
REDEM PTION MANUAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 11 5 

would not wish to invest in them: so large a corporation would be unwieldy; the immensity of 
the monopoly might excite alarm and provoke opposition. It would serve them better to operate 
through smaller corporations. A few capitalists might hold the stock of a great number of them 
without exciting jealousy and their management would be quiet and easy. The different 
corporations were like the regiments of an army: it was easy to form them into brigades, and 
divisions, and army corps, in order to give them the compact solidity of a grand military 
organization. It had the flexibility of individual enterprise, and the solidity of despotism. The 
Money Kings adopted the policy of single corporate companies for each special enterprise. 
They built manufactories of all kinds: they started iron mills, woolen mills and cotton mills. 
Manufactures of all kinds sprung up everywhere. The Money Kings organized new joint stock 
corporations, which built mills and manufactories. New companies operated mines of coal and 
iron, as Commerce energetically expanded through manufactures wrought by steam power. 
They organized new companies, which built vessels to plow the waters of every ocean, and built 
new warehouses. They established new trading stations all over the earth. 
Commerce had languished in previous ages because the Earth's Temperate zone did not have 
sufficiently cheap products suited to tropical demand to offer in exchange for tropical 
productions. Steam manufactures opened up a new commercial era. They greatly stimulated 
tropical production, by offering manufactures in those markets. They also greatly stimulated 
industry in the Temperate zone. In all the countries of the Temperate zone, the demand for the 
manufactures of Britain was far beyond the ability to pay for them with exports. 
The first effect of this state of things was a wave of excitement that swept over Great Britain. An 
industrial boom was started. Everybody had money invested in the stock of manufacturing 
companies, shipping companies, trading companies. The Money Kings took care to have the 
majority of stock: outside companies for steam manufactures they knew they could devour at 
their leisure. The grand Money Kings had such advantages in their immense capital and in their 
perfect organization, that in commercial crises, often originated and always manipulated by 
them, they managed systematically to break down rival companies and buy them out. They 
robbed and plundered the minority stockholders. In the end, these organized capitalists got into 
their own hands, and for a pittance of the true value, all, or the greater part of, the stock of the 
various companies, manufacturing, mercantile and shipping, that originated in steam 
manufactures. They thus reduced to a system and a science the art of crushing rival companies 
and freezing out minority stockholders. Their whole career was a systematic course of treachery, 
fraud and plunder, without a parallel in history. They advanced step by step, always causing a 
boom in every new enterprise that enlisted much outside capital, always managing to operate 
within seasons of business disaster. They lost a few hundred thousand by falling prices, a loss 
which they were abundantly able to stand, while making many millions by obtaining cheaply the 
stock of broken corporations and the stock sold by minority stockholders. 
Dealing in futures in Boards of Trade, was then started on a grand scale. This system originated 
for the purpose of enabling large capitalists to force stocks up or down as they chose, by dint of 
capital, without any regard to the actual value-the most satanic engine of trickery, fraud and 
oppression ever devised to enable the strong to plunder the weak. It is the drag net with which 
the Money Kings destroy multitudes of men of small means. Like the fisherman takes fish in his 
REDEM PTIO N MANUAL - FO UR POIN T FIVE ED ITION 11 6 

sea, they are fishermen and the rest of mankind is their prey. They are always seeking after 
spoil. They are always dragging their net for the destruction of the unwary. 
But aside from this plunder of the weak and the trusting, the regular profits of the new age of 
industry were very large . In every social construct or compact of the Temperate zone, the 
ongoing demand for British manufactures was much greater than could be paid for by exports. 
The difference in the balance of trade was always systematically arranged by lending money on 
mortgage for that amount, or by spending the amount of the deficit in starting some business 
enterprise in that locale of so-called country. In this way, the adverse balance of trade was not 
felt by the economic community of the locality falling behind. It bought all it wanted, and the 
adverse balance of trade actually made times better; for it caused the profits of the Money Kings 
to be invest ed in the so-called country, stimulating business into activity. The disadvantage was 
the business invest ment did not belong to the so-called nation, but to the Money Kings : and the 
prosperity it caused was not national prosperity, but was the bloated gains of the Money Kings . 
The regular method of the Money Kings for the last hundred years has been to start new 
manufactures, new shipping compan ies, new trading companies ; gather in all the outside capital 
possible; freeze out minority stockholders; and throttle outside corporations. This effectively 
indebted all nations to them. First, they would make parasitic investments equal to the amount of 
the deficit of the balance of trade. This was done by putting in the profits derived from the East 
India Company. Then, after invest ing these profits, they would continually reinvest any future 
profits of all their enterprises in each and every count ry until their invest ments accumulated like 
rolling balls of snow, to at last become an avalanche under which to bury the prosperity of the 
world. 
Rise of the Money Kings 
THE WAR FO R INDEPENDENCE 
Approximately 3 percent of the confederate population participated in one of the bloodiest wars 
in hist ory and allegedly won their independenc e. They understood the historical roots of war, 
injustice and oppression beca use they experienced it first-hand-knowledge, which has since 
been lost to posterity. The victor' s history books do indeed leave out much truth and lied about 
much of the rest to justify the outcome and to control the future labor pool to the victor' s wants 
and needs within such conquered areas . 
The primary reason for the War for Independence was not "taxation without representation," but 
the forced payment of taxes to the King in gold instead of paper money. America was flourishing 
by using her own "fiat money" system based only on production, not a gold-based system that 
could be manipulated by the King. The King could not "control" the fiat money system and 
therefore passe d a law requiring that taxes be paid in gold only. The King had most of the gold­
the colonies had little, so unemployment ensued. The embittered colonists cried for war. 
Benjamin Franklin put it this way, "The colonies would have gladly born the little tax on tea, and 
other matters, had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money." Prior to 
the Revolutionary War (1 774), The Times of London said this regarding fiat money in America: 
REDEM PTION MANUAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 11 7 

"If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origins in North America, shall 
become endurrated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own 
money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the 
money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without 
precedent in the history of the world. The brains and the wealth of all the 
countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will 
destroy every Monarchy on the globe." 
The truth is that the Revolution failed. You might say that we won a military victory over the 
most powerful military force on the planet at the time. However, reading the Treaty of Paris 
(signed the Winter of 17 82) it becomes clear that we were not exactly negotiating as equals. 
We had won the recall of British troops but not the bankers . Even though we are taught that we 
won our independenc e from England, we actually were able to remain free from the international 
bankers for only a few years at the close of the presidenc y of Andrew Jackson. The most visible 
of the power structure was the East India Company owned by the bankers and the Crown in 
London, England. This was an entirely private enterprise whose flag was adopted by Queen 
Elizabeth in 16 00-thirteen red and white horizontal stripes with a blue rectangle in its upper 
left-hand comer. All debts owed before the war were to be collected by the foreign creditors, 
(i.e., trading companies) by and through the Customhouses run by these trading companies . The 
practice goes on to this very day throughout the planet. Various Customhouses of the many so­
called countr ies fall directly under the control of foreign agents to ensure the payment and 
service of the past and present debts. 
WHO WAS BEHIND THE CONS TIT UTION 
When the creditors of the new social compact of the so-called "The United St ates of America" as 
a nation/state found the Ar ticles of Confederation to be inadequate to exact payment from their 
young debtor, the Constitution was written. This document put into operation the Treaty of Paris 
and tho se on-going amendments thereto. It was supported by the bankers through their 
associates, to increase their control over the social compact known as "The United St ates of 
America." Had the Articles of Confederation been completed and adopted, instead of the 
Constitution, the bankers would have had far less control over the signatories to the social 
compact or to their posterity in the future. 
Any Constitution must have some prior reference to establish its foundation. The authority for 
the so-called American Constitution is alleged to be based upon the Bible ; the Magna Charta, 
signed in 1215 by King John; the Petition of Rights, granted by King Charles I in 16 28; the 
Engli sh Bi ll of Rights, granted by William and Mary in 16 89; the right of habeas corpus, granted 
by King Char les II, and the Articles of Confederation, 17 81. And accordingly, any and every 
Constitution thereafter must have an enabling clause. From this point onward, no Constitution 
may dimini sh, in any manner, those rights already established in the above six documents 
relative to the social compact to which it referred and to whom such was created by or for, other 
than by such powers, as enumerated for such causes, as might be demonstrated. The 
REDEM PTIO N MANUA L - FOUR POINT FIVE ED ITION 11 8 

beneficiaries thereof, may and of right, collectively establish according to principles by which 
any previous social compact was established to begin with may reinstitute new safeguards for 
their freedom, liberty, and pursuit of happine ss for themselves and their posterity, laying its 
foundations upon such principles as they shall see fit to secure these benefits unto themselv es. 
The Declaration of Independence declared universally to a candid world that all people were 
sovereign under the Creator's Natural Law when they took upon themselves the Mantle of 
So vereignty, singularly, jointly, and severally, and assumed among the powers of Earth their 
separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature's Creator entitle them. These 
Sov ereign People of the various E'S tates of Planet Earth, created their separate and equal St ate 
body corporate governments for the protection of their rights in a Union (Marriage) of the 
Se veral St ates, to better serve these ends for themselves and their posterity. These endeavors in 
Union, sought foreign Alliance to better firm up their collective relationship to the various social 
compacts of the time in the interest of good will and peace within the International Public Order 
of the day. They delegated certain authority from the people 's powers (those signatory to the 
founding documents creating the social compact) by and through the several State Constitutions 
in order that the three branches of agency government could properly carry out the dictates 
outlined in the St ate Constitutions to protect their rights in relation to foreign exchange that 
might arise from time to time by the formality of treaty. 
The so-called American Constitution created a new structure of central agency government that 
was established on a much higher plane than either the parliamentary system or the confederation 
of states when delegating agency powers for foreign purposes as delineated by the social 
compact to govern such agency power. It was a people's "Constitutional republic," where a 
certain amount of power was reserved to the states and a certain amount was delegated to the 
federal agency government. The so-called agency United St ates, by way of the United St ates in 
Congress Asse mbled, has certain powers delegated by the Constitution. So far as the several 
St ates party to the Constitution are concerned, the United St ates may not exercise power that is 
not delegated by the Constitution. All power not delegated to the United St ates by the 
Constitution is reserved to the several St ates within their respective territorial borders-or, to the 
(sig natory and/or their posterity currently living) people. 
BRITISH SUBVERSION, BANKS , AND TREASON 
Even though the Treaty of Paris allegedly ended the open Revolutionary War in 17 83, it did not 
covertly stop the Crown and their Money Kings from subverting the newly found politica l 
structure by whatever means possible . Si mply put, the fact of the continuing existence of the 
social compact as it was designed threatened the Monarchies and Money Kings where it hurt 
most: financially, by a collective of Sovereign People by and through their State body corporate 
governments and central agency government. It effectively severed the nexus third party 
attachment, if properly attended with respect to the So vereign People behind the Veil of the 
Corporation so established. But, where in hist ory have any people kept eternal vigila nce, either 
of themselves or for their posterity or their posterity when times are easy, after the sacrifice and 
success of their forefathers? The Sovereign People (forefathers of the social compact) had paid 
REDEM PTION MA N UAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED IT ION 11 9 

close attention to how the Crown and Money Kings had used corporations to plunder the people 
and hidden itself behind this veil to limit the Money Kings ' and Crown' s liability arising via tort. 
This was because of the Money Kings and Crowns avarice desire to rule all walks of life, 
whether such people fell within the moral jurisdiction of the Crowns or not. The forefathers who 
created the social compact known as "The United St ates of America" in turn reversed the use of 
corporations to protect themselves and their posterity from the Crown to their benefit. The so­
called United St ates stood as a heroic role model for a short time, for other weaker social 
compacts around the planet, which inspired them to also struggle against oppressive Money 
Kings and Monarchies, etc. The French Revolution (17 89-1 799) and the Polish Uprising (1 794) 
were, in part, encouraged by the so-called American Revolution. Locally speaking, we the 
people stood like a beacon of hope for most of the world. The Money Kings and Monarchies 
regarded the so-called United St ates as a politica l infection, the principle source of radical 
republican democracy that was destroying the Money Kings and Monarchies (more importantly 
the Money Kings, the power behind the Crowns) around the world. The Money Kings and 
Monarchies realized that if the principle source of that infection could be destroyed, the rest of 
the world might avoid the contagion and the Monarchies would be saved . 
Knowing they couldn't destroy us militarily, they resorted to more covert methods of political 
and financial subversion, employing spies and secret agents (Attorneys) skilled in bribery and 
legal deception. This was perhaps the first "cold war." In the 17 94 Jay Treaty, the United St ates 
agreed to pay £600,000 sterling to King George III, as reparations for the so-called American 
Revolution which came about not from any one people of the so-called Americas damagi ng the 
Crown, but because the Crown and Money Kings had sought to invade the private lives of all 
walks of life without real representation. The US Senate ratified the treaty in secret ses sion and 
ordered that it not be published. When Benjamin Franklin' s grandson published it anyway 
(perhaps our first whistleblower), the exposure and resulting public up-roar so angered the 
Congress that it passe d the Alien and Se dition Acts (17 98) so that federal judges could prosecute 
editors and publish ers for reporting the truth about the government. So much for the so-called 
people 's rights of freedom of speech who were not signatory to the social compact. And who are 
these people who claim a right under a contract to which they themselves were not signatory? 
Are they related to the actual signatories by blood, as one of their posterity to which the 
contractual nexus could pos sibly extend to state a Claim of Action concerning such speech from 
which such posterity of the signatories could be granted relief? No. Not ONE of them had any 
true credibility, especially concerning any member of the State Compact Party St ates of the 
Union (Marriage) of the Se veral St ates. That would be like someone coming to your bed and 
claiming a right of prima noctae (the right of first night-the right of the nobleman of ancient 
times in England, and various other jurisdiction s, to take to themselves the brides within their 
domain during the first night after the wedding of the peasants for their own pleas ure and to be 
returned the following day after the young bride had been deflowered by the nobleman). Not 
something that we would likely stand for now, is it ?! So, how is it one can presume to cla im a 
right under a social compact, i.e., Constitution, to which you are not signat ory to, nor related in 
some form or anot her as their posterity, to be able to state a claim for which relief coul d possibl y 
be granted by any prov able underlying contractual nexus for their agents to be abl e to recognize 
a liability on their part to petjorm in some fiduciary manner, on your behalf, for any assumed 
breach of contract concern ing any alleged claim of right arising thereunder, as stated or 
claimed by you, in a forum to which, for all intents and purposes, is foreign to you and looked 
REDEM PTIO N MANUAL - FOU R POINT FIVE ED ITION 120 

upon in the same mann er by such a one, relative to you and your standing, to state a claim for 
which relief can be granted in such forum. Unless you can prove a contractual nexus, you'r e 
"burnt toast," an alien in their regard, with no possi ble expectation that you would be viewed 
otherwise or have any inherent right to protection or benevolence. 
Si nce they supposedly had won the Revolutionary War, why would their Se nators agree to pay 
reparations to the loser? Why would they agree to pay £600,0 00 sterling, eleven years after the 
war ended? It doesn't make sense, especially in light of the Se nate's secrecy and later fury over 
being exposed ... unless we assume their Sena tors (Attorneys) had been bribed (or were already 
in the service thereof) to serve the Money Kings and Briti sh monarchy to betray the so-called 
American people ! That is treason only in regards to the intents and purposes of the original 
creators of the social compact and the then and after living posterity thereof! 
From the beginnin g, the United St ates Bank had been op posed by the Democratic-Republicans 
lead by Thomas Jefferson, but the Federalists (the pro-monarchy party) won the vote (17 96) . The 
initial capitalization was $ 10 ,000,000 --80% of which would be owned by foreign bankers. 
Si nce the bank was authorized to lend up to $20,0 00,000 (double its paid capital), it was a 
profitable deal for both government and the bankers, since they could lend and collect interest on 
$1 0,000,000 that did not exist. 
However, the European bankers outfoxed the agency U.S. government. By 17 96, the agency U.S. 
government owed the bank $6,200, 000 and was forced to sell most of its shares. By 18 02, our 
government owned no stock in the United St ates Bank! 
Thomas Jefferson had warned (1 802) : 
"If the Am erican people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their 
currenc y, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks ... will deprive the people of all 
property unt il their children wake-up hom eless on the continent their fathers 
conqu ered .... The issuing powe r shoul d be taken from the banks and restored to the 
people, to whom it properly belongs. " 
BAN K FRAUD, BRIBERY, AND CORRUPTION 
Chief among the international financiers was Amshe1 Bauer of Germany who, in 17 48 opened a 
goldsmith shop under the name of Red Shield. (In German, the name is spelled Rothschild and is 
pronounced Rote-shilld) . In 17 87, Amshel (Bauer) Rothschild made the famous statement: 
"Let me issue and cont rol a Nation 's money, and I care not who writes the laws. " He 
had five Sons Amshel Mayer, Solomon, Jacob, Nathan, and Carl. In 1798, the five 
Rothschild brothers expanded by opening banks in Germany, Vienna, Paris, London, 
and Naples. 
The objective behind these bankers was to establish a clearinghouse/warehouse (bank) which 
REDEM PTION MANUA L - FO UR POINT FIVE EDI TION 12 1 

was to receive specia l privilege and immunity to use the unjust fractional reserve banking in 
order to print money and loan it to the agency government and corporate industry charter via the 
corporate agency government. No beneficial interest could accrue from any beneficial use from 
any circulation of any note generated via the charter. This was established by the agency United 
St ates for the purpose of servicing the debt of the corporate United St ates and for the purpose of 
transferring the liability of the accrued debt, which had never been extinguished since the 17 70' s, 
forward without interest being paid to the (fiscal agents of the Crown) bankers. Through these 
schemes, the corporate agency government contrived to pass the liability through adhesion 
contracts to other walks of life under various new deals to discharge thereon debts to the Crown. 
One of the very simple schemes foisted upon the people at large was fractional reserve banking. 
It is simply a specia l privilege given to a man or group of men to create credit out of thin air. The 
schemes are executed by extending this credit/debt to any and everyone else in or found about a 
loosely associated people closely associa ted with a particular society or social compact. By, and 
through, such misrepresentations perpetrated upon such Walks of Life. which do not have the 
same access to the same privileges or immunities that the creator of the social compact or their 
posterity have, and thereby are burdened with paying the collecting fees from servicing the 
alleged debt of the social compact, the ass umed value of money and the attached-plus interest -
for the cost of the use of the units created to discharge in tender of debt thereof. Due to the 
beneficial interest created by the use of such instruments created by fractional reserve banking, 
the Crown and Money Kings become very rich and the agency government is allowed to 
continue to legally discharge its debt and service their liability without ha ving to produce 
anything of value other than to 'a ttorn' such property (by and through such Attorneys of the 
Crown) from the unaware populous not familiar with the principals of discha rge, contractually 
speaking, which is only a viable option to those which exercise credibility to expatriate from 
such as sumed nexus with such social compact and its liability and repatriate according to the 
principals of International Public Order into such society to which they become a creative 
signatory member thereof to such social compact, thereby creating a nexus for their safety, 
liberty, and pursuit of happine ss by creating a hereditary birthright and standing to which their 
posterity may acquire by birth as well. 
The basic mathematics behind the fractional banking system is very clear. If this system is left in 
place long eno ugh, the man or group who controls this system of debt creation will own all the 
gold available in the social compact however known as a nation/state, kingdom or otherwise. 
Once the supply of real portable specie money (gold/silver or whatever the medium of exchange, 
whether money of account or money of exchange (species) is in his or their hands, this man or 
group of men becomes the master of the entire economic field of endeavor of such social 
compact. Why? Because this man or group of men controls the only source of operating medium 
(money, however defined) available through which the social compact functions to discharge 
debt. Only the man who has the privilege of printing and/or minting the money and loaning or 
extending such as interest can determine who gets specia l (drawing rights) funding-his friends 
and allies . Everyone else is limited to how much money (of account or exchange) they have 
access to; therefore, after two or three generations, the friends and allies of this "banker" will 
own all of the energy of such social compact. This present condition is being played out in the 
so-called American society and is now owned by a small cadre of very wealthy men throughout 
the planet. This same scheme of fractional reserve manipulation is being played out, throughout 
REDEM PTIO N MANUAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 122 

all of the various political social constructs globally with ONE aim, world domination of each 
and every resource to which the Planet Earth can produce for their selfish benefit, including the 
absolute control of each and every living soul upon the planet to be forced economically into 
serving solely the private interests and gain of the Money Kings . 
How long the fractional banking process takes to work its way through the wealth of any social 
compact depends upon how successf ul the "banker" is in forcing, through bribery and corruption, 
the restriction of the formal agency government's is suance of real money backed by gold or 
silver or such other medium of account or exchange . Species currency is put into circulation to 
honestly and truly lli!Y debt or discha rge whatever liability is acquired which may or may not 
arise when one increases one's E'St ate through the benefit of their efforts and labor as most 
people evidentially wished to. Was this not the American Dream? Furthermore, as the supply of 
real money shrinks, the people of any social compact are forced to rely on the creation of a 
fictitious debt by the privileged few to a greater and greater extent, until finally, the only thing 
left is a massive amount of "un-payable deb t," with no way to lawfully discharge their acquired 
debt, which was created from nothing and consists only of the interest charged upon the fictitious 
debt, while collecting interest for every moment of its exist ence. All this for the benefit of the 
privileged, who become the de facto (ille gally usurped) agency government because of the 
"money power" they allow to be wielded by and through the social compact. Few are ever 
aware of the true damages done to their E'S tates or that of such E' St ate to which may or may 
not be possi ble to pass by hereditary right so-to-speak and the debt which if not lawfully 
discharged back to the Original source or Creator of the debt, passes on to future generations of 
their posterity, creating a continuous debtor class people (subje cts now of the Money Kings) to 
the whims of a foreign despotic tyrannical power. 
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK 
Through the Bank of England, the Rothschild s/the Money Kings demanded (did you ever 
wonder how they could make such a demand of the Crown) a private bank in the so-called 
United St ates to hold the securities of the United St ates as the pledged asse ts to the Crown of 
England in order to secure the debt to which the signatories of the social compact by and through 
their agency government had defaulted. As one of his first acts, President Washington declared a 
financial emergency. William Morris with the help of Alexander Hamilton, Se cretary of 
Treasury, hea vily promoted the creation of a private banker's clearinghouse (customhouse) to 
service the debt to the international bankers. In 17 91, Congress chartered the first national bank 
(banker's clearinghouse) for a term of 20 years, to hold the securities of the same European 
bankers who had been holding the debts before the war. The bankers loaned worthless, un­
backed, non-secured printed money of acc ount to each other to charter this first bank. On 
December 12 , 17 91, the Bank of the United St ates opened its doors in Philadelphia. 
The holders of the securities were the private bankers. So under Public International Law, the 
Creditor (Crown of England) forced the so-called United St ates to establi sh a private banker' s 
clearinghouse (warehouse) to hold the securities as the collateral for the (social compact) so­
called national debt. 
James Madison had warned: 
REDEM PTION MANUA L - FO UR POINT FIVE EDITION 123 

"History recor ds that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, 
dece it, and violent means possible to maint ain their cont rol over government s by 
cont rolling money and its issuance. " 
BRITSH SUBV ERSION, TITLES OF NOBILITY & TREASON 
From the early decades of U. S. history, relations between the United St ates and Great Britain 
remained strained. Their relationship deteriorated sharply with the outbreak of war in Europe in 
18 03 . Britain imposed a blockade on neutral (social compact) countries such as the United 
St ates. In addition, the British took people acting under an agency status as American sailors 
from their ships and forced them to serve in the British Navy. Concerned about the many 
English spies and troublemakers, the United St ates in Congress Asse mbled, passed an 
amendment to prevent those who had English titles and connections from obtaining any seat in 
government . Called the Titles of Nobility Act (TONA, 18 10 -11), it reads as follows: 
"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title 
of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain 
any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any 
emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of 
the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit 
under them, or either of them. " 
This congress ional act (TONA) was later to amend the U.S. Constitution as the Original XIII 
Amendment, which led to the War of 1812 with Great Britain. Furthermore, it took the Civil 
War to officially force the gradual replacement of this amendment to be taken from all reference 
from every state published record with what is now known as the Sla very Amendment or the 
Amendment created as an act against Involuntary Se rvitude (1 863), a War-time Act passed 
under Martial Law. 
All "t itles of nobility " were prohibited in both Article VI of the Articles of Confederation of 
"The United States of America" (1777) and in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution of the 
"United States" (1778), but there was no penalty. Although already prohibited by the 
Constitution, an additional "t itle of nobility " amendment was deemed necessary and was 
proposed in 1789, again in 1810, and finally ratified in 1819. But the notice of ratification 
delivered to the Se cretary of St ate, an attorney with the tit le, "Esquire," disappeared. As a 
result, there still is no penalty for accepting titles or emoluments from foreign rulers today, just 
the prohibiti on. 
Clearly, the founding fathers saw such a serious threat in "t itles of nobility " and "h onors," that 
anyone receiving them would be required to forfeit their citizen ship . Obviou sly the Amendment 
carried much more signif icance for their founding fathers than is readily apparent today. The 
forefathers knew that their freedom and that of their posterity could be subverted from inside 
their agency government and had sought to prevent such a bitter betrayal. Today, most Se nators, 
Congressmen, all Federal Judges, and most of their Presidents are attorneys who carry the title 
REDEM PTIO N MANUAL - FOUR POINT FIVE ED ITION 124 

"Esquire," often abbreviated as "Esq." Nevertheless, the U.S. Constitution still forbids this. 
In Colonial America, attorneys trained attorneys, but most held no "title of nobility " or "honor. " 
There was no requirement that one be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney, 
attorney general, or judge; a citizen 's "c ounsel of choice" was not restricted to a lawyer and 
there was no state or national bar associations. The only organization that certified lawyers was 
the International Bar Association (IBA), chartered by the King of England (known as the 
British Accreditation Regist ry), headquartered in London and recognized everywhere as the 
BAR. Lawyers admitted to the IBA, or otherwise BAR, as it is most readily known everywhere, 
receive the rank "E squire " - a "t itle of British nobilit y." 
"E squire" was the principle title of nobility which the 13 th Amendment sought to prohibit from 
exercisi ng any office within the United Stat es. Why? Because the loyalty of "Esquire" lawyers 
was suspect ! Lawyers with an "E squire " behind their names were agents of the Money 
Changers and the Monarchy, and members of an organization whose principle purposes were 
political and regarded with the same wariness that some people today reserve for members of the 
KGB or the CIA. 
The archaic definition of "h onor" (as used when the 13 th Amendment was ratified) meant 
anyone "o btaining or having an advantage or privilege over anothe r." A contemporary 
example of an "h onor" granted to only a few Americans is the privilege of being a judge : 
lawyers can be judges and exercise the attendant privileges and powers, non-lawyers generally 
cannot. We address the judge as, "your Honor." 
By prohibiting "h onors," the missing, but now found, original 13 th amendment prohibits any 
advantage or privilege that would grant some citizens an equal opportunity to achieve or 
exercise political power. Therefore, the second meaning (intent) of the original 13 th 
Amendment was to ensure politica l equality among all citizens of the United St ates, by 
prohibiting anyone, even government officials, from claiming or exercisi ng a special privilege or 
power (an "honor ") over other citize ns. Now, what would happen if this amendment were 
enforced? It would cause an immediate chaos in all three branches of the agency federal 
government and the same in each and every State of the Union because these same Attorneys sit 
in every seat of power throughout every level of the social compact for the sole purpose of 
enforcing the mandates of the Money Kings and the Crown of England, even upon those people 
to whom the alleged original debt was incurred by, that has absolutely nothing to do with either 
said people or through any nexus of the social compact to which their forefathers had accepted 
the liability of such debt in the 17 70s, nor does any people not signatory or evidencing any 
hereditary pr ivileges as their posterity incur any liability for such debt by any stretch of the 
imaginings of such perfidious Attorneys who practice their pedifoggery upon all walks of life by 
and through such frauds perpetrated upon them by these leeches of the ancient Money Changers 
living upon the economic well-being of any and all societies known as Attorneys. 
Both "e squ ire" and "h onor" would be key targets of the 13 th Amendment even today. 
Because, while "titles of nobility" no longer apply now precisely as they did back in the early 
18 00's, it is clear that an "esquire" or BAR attorney receives far better treatment than a layman, 
in and by their courts, as well as by the public at large, in general. Whereas, if you represent 
REDEMP TION MANUA L - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 125 

yourself pro per, in se, or speak as a So vereign in proprius per sonam , you are treated as though 
you were rabble. Your opinions are of little importance in their courts and you are more than 
often treated similarly by such agency government officials. Because you are not an "e squires " 
or BAR attorney, you are considered to be a useless eater, a subje ct "out of control." The 
concept of "h onor" remains relevant, possi bly more so today than at any previous time in U.S. 
history, for they, the "h onors," are greatly feared and even revered, even by their esquires who 
are considered to be below them. Si nce the Original 13 th Amendment has never been repealed, 
all acts of their government since 181 9 are technically null and void. Most so-called 
lawmakers, are attorneys and are prohibited from participation in any office of government by 
the true amended social compact contract known as U. S. Constitution. Thereby, every attorney 
should be stripped of his or her appearance of right to hold any office as an agent representing 
any so-called citizen of the United St ates under TONA aforementioned, who have continued to 
interje ct themselves into the political process solely for their benefit of gainful pill aging and 
plunder. 
When people discove red that European banking interests owned most of the United St ates Bank 
where they deposited their hard earned savings, they saw the sheer power of the banks and their 
ability to influence representative government by economic manipulation and outright bribery. 
On February 20, 1811, Congress therefore refused to renew the Banke r's charter on the 
grounds that the Bank was unconstitutional . This led to the withdrawal of $7,000,000 in specie 
(money in coin) by European invest ors, which in tum, precipitated an economic recession, and 
the War of 1812. This "w ar" was punishment for the United St ates in Congress As sembled, 
refusing under the pressure of people becoming aware of this manipulation, to do business on 
the terms of the International Banking families of the House of Rothschild, through the first 
Bank of the United St ates. Congress refused to let the National Bank renew its Charter, fearing 
for their safety. 
Except for Gen. Andrew Jackson 's victory in the Battle of New Orleans, the War of 1812 
produced a string of American military disasters. The most shocking of these was the British 
Army's burning of the Capitol, the President 's house, the Library of Congress and other public 
buildings in Washington on August 24 and 25, 18 14. (Americans had previou sly burned public 
buildings in Canada.) During the War of 1812 , so-called national archives of the United St ates 
and many libraries and document repositories were burned and some of the evidence of the 
TONA previously mentioned disappeared. Nevertheless, the legisla ture of Virginia ratified the 
amendment and it was subsequently printed in many officia l publications as the 13 th 
Amendment, even in St ates which had NOT ratified, such as Connecticut and several States that 
came into the Union later in hist ory. Beg inning in 18 32, it began to disappear from texts , 
although official state publications continued to publish it as late as 18 76. 
There are undoubtedly other examples of the Money King' s and the Monarchy's efforts to 
subvert or destroy the so-called social compact known as the United St ates . Some are common 
knowledge, while others remain to be disclosed to the public . For example, national archivist 
David Dodge disc overed a book called 2 VA LAW in the Library of Congress Law Library. 
According to Dodge, "T his is an un-catalogued book in the rare book section that reveals a 
plan to overthrow the Constitutional government by secret agreements engineered by the 
lawyers of the time." That is one of the reasons why the TONA was ratified by the state of 
REDEM PTIO N MANUAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 126 

Virginia in the particular manner in which they did, although the alleged "notification" thereof 
was a long time thereafter claimed to have been "lost in the mail ." You see, there is no public 
record that this aforementioned book exists either ! 
That may sound surprising, but according to The Gazette (5/ 1 0/9 1), "T he Library of Congress 
has 349,402 un-catalogued rare books and 13.9 million un-catalogued rare manuscripts ." 
There may be secrets buried in that mass of documents even more astonishing than a mi ssing 
Constitutional Amendment. Yet this image of documentary disarray appropriately describes our 
situation today: we are inundated with useless information while we are misdirected from 
information that we have not had the time or interest to sort through. As a result we have lost a 
precious treasure in the chaos and turmoil of daily life: our sovereignty. 
One amazing aspect of the War of 1812 was the exi stence of a depression during wartime. War 
always brings a short-term prosperity, except in the case of this war. To understand this, it is 
vital for you to know that all depressions and recessions are artificially created through the 
restriction of a medium of accounting or exchange-money. This restriction keeps so-called 
money OUT of circulation, which means fewer funds available to facilitate production and 
distribution. Furthermore, this means poverty and starvation for all walks of life not privy to 
such plunder. 
The precariousness of agency government finance during the war and the post war recession 
convinced the Republican agency government under James Madison to re-establish a so-called 
national bank. Thus was created the Se cond Bank of the United States in 18 16 . 
THE SECOND NATIONAL BANK 
In January 9, 18 32, The Se cond National Bank applied for a charter renewal 4 years early. This 
time, President Andrew Jackson vetoed the Bank's recharter on the grounds that the Bank was 
unconstitutional and he successfully paid off the national debt leaving the U.S. with a surplus of 
$5,000. He said, "If congress has the right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it 
was given them to use themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations." 
On January 30, 18 35, President Andrew Jackson attended a congressional funeral in the Capitol 
building . As he exited, Richard Lawrence, an unemployed house painter, pointed a pistol at 
Jackson and fired. The percussion cap exploded, but the bullet did not discharge . The enraged 
Jackson raised his cane to strike his attacker, who fired again . The second weapon also misfired 
and the sixty-seven-year-old president escaped assa ssination at close range. Jackson was 
convinced that Lawrence was hired by his political enemies, the Whigs, to stop his plan to 
destroy the Bank of the United St ates. 
Andrew Jackson violated Public International Law because he denied the Creditor his just 
lien/settlement rights on/from the debtor. However, the bankers did not lend value 
(substanc e), so in actuality they had an unperfected lien. Therefore the law actually did not 
apply. 
REDEM PTION MA N UAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 127 

THE END OF THE AMERICAN REPUB LI C: 
THE SHADOW GO VERNMENT IS BORN 
In 18 60-61, the Southern states walked out of the United St ates in Congress Asse mbled . This 
created sine die, a situation in which not enough representatives were pr esent to carry on 
legisla tive business. This was a Constitutional crisis that the newly elected president, Abraham 
Lincoln, had to resolve. 
The Introduction to Se nate Report 93-549 (93rd Congress, 1s t Ses sion, 19 73) summarizes the 
situation as best as possible: 
"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives und er 
emer gency rule. . . And , in the United States, actions taken by the Govern ment in 
times of great crises have -from, at least, the Civil War-in important ways, shaped 
the present phenomenon of a per manent state of national emer gency. " 
From the U.S. Congress ional research information available, it can be reasonably proven that 
when the Representatives of the So uthern Compact Party Members of the St ates of the Union 
walked out of United St ates in Congress As sembled on March 27, 1861, the quorum to conduct 
business under the social compact contract known as the United St ates Constitution for "The 
United St ates of America" was lost. Thus, the only votes that the remaining representatives of 
the United St ates in Congress Asse mbled could lawfully take, under parliamentary law, were 
those to set the time to reconvene, take a vote to get a quorum, and vote to adjourn and set a 
date, time, and place to reconvene at a later time . Instead, the remaining representatives of the 
United St ates in Congress Ass embled apparently abandoned the representative House and 
Se nate of the United St ates without setting a date to reconvene. Under the parliamentary 
procedures of said Congress, when this happened, Congress became sine die (pronounced see-na 
dee-a; literally "without day") and thus, when Congress adjourned sine die, it ceased to exist as a 
lawful deliberative body, and thus the only lawful, Constitutional power that could declare war 
was no longer lawful, or in session. 
It can also be reasonably proven that the Representative So uthern Members of the Se veral St ates 
of the Union, by virtue of their secession from the Union, also ceased to exist sine die, and that 
some state legisla tures in the Northern bloc also adjourned sine die, and thus, all the states which 
were parties to creating the social compact contract known as the United St ates Const itution for 
"The United St ates of America" apparently ceased to exist. On April 15, 18 61, so-called 
President, Mr. Abraham Lincoln executed an executive order as Commander-in-Chief, Lincoln 
Executive Proclamation 1, and it can also be reasonably proven that "The United States of 
America" have been ruled ever since by these same Military Executive Powers denoted as 
Executive Orders . 
It can also be reasonably proven that when a supposed Congress eventually did reconvene, it 
was reconvened under the military authority of the Commander-in-Chief and not by Rules of 
Order for Parliamentary bodies or by so-called contractual Constitutional Law, thus placing the 
REDEM PTIO N MA NUA L - FO UR POIN T FIVE ED IT ION 128 

so-called each and every people under martial rule ever since the "n ational emergency " 
declared by President Lincoln . Thus, the so-called Constitution for "The United States of 
America" has subsequently and temporarily ceased being the acknowledged law of the land in 
many courts. The assumed title of President, the assumed title of Congress, and the assumed 
jurisdiction of the courts thereof, have unlawfully presumed that they were free to remake the 
Union in a new image under the so-called Law of Necessi ty. Whereas, lawfully, no such 
Constitutional provis ions were, or are, in place which afforded power to any of the actions 
which were taken which presumed to place the Union under the new form of control or 
desig nation as a Democracy. 
The so-called President, Mr. Abraham Lincoln, apparently knew that his executive orders no 
longer had any force under contractual Constitutional Law. So he commis sioned General 
Orders No. 100 (April 24, 18 63), apparently as a special code to govern his actions under 
martial law and to justify the seizure of power. This further extended the laws of the District of 
Columbia and also fictionally implemented the provisions of Article I, Section 8, Clauses 17-
18 of the defunct contract known as the Constitution, beyond the boundaries of Washington, 
D.C., and illegitimately into the several St ates no longer united under the central agency 
government of the United St ates. General Orders No. 100, also called the Lieber Instructions 
and the Lieber Code, have apparently extended the laws of war and private international law 
into the so-called Se veral St ates of the Union. The defunct agency United St ates government 
assumed power and become the presumed military conqueror of all the people to which it could 
bend its will by misrepresentation over the land of the former Se veral St ates of the Union. 
Martial rule has apparently been kept secret and has never really ended . Lincoln was 
assas sinated before he could complete the implementation of his plan to constitutionally, and not 
militarily, reform the Southern agency governments and restore the United St ates in Congress 
As sembled. Ever since, the so-called social compact known as "The United St ates of America" 
has been ruled under military law under the assumed and illegitimate Commander-In-Chief-the 
President-and his assumed executive powers according to the policies of Executive Orders of a 
non-existent social compact via a military dictator type of functionary for the Money Kings and 
the Crown of England under the Law of Necessity according to the princ ipals of International 
Public Order. 
Constitutional law under the original So cial Compact for the Seve ral St ates of the Union is 
apparently enforced only as a matter of keeping the public peace under the provisions of 
General Orders No. 100 under martial (law) rule. This "p eace " is further evidenced in the 
Preamble of the so-called Expatriation Act of 1868. Under martial law, title is a mere fiction, 
since all property belongs to the military except for that property which the Commander­
in-Chief may, in his benevolence, exempt from taxation and seizure and upon which he 
allows the "e nemy " to reside. 
In proclaiming the first Trading with the Enemy Act by Executive Order, the illegitimate so­
called President, Mr. Abraham Lincoln (an Attorney) set in place the means by which the federal 
new agency military government could interact with all walks of life who were not 14 th 
Amendment citizens (those non regi stered voters per the 15 th Amendment of the altered status of 
resident alien). Such people could technically be desig nated as enemies. Are you beginning to 
REDEM PTION MA N UAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED IT ION 129 

understand how people not a party to the regime of necessity could be at odds with their 
condition appertaining to such military agency "government," of Necessity? 
In a messa ge to Congress on December 3, 18 61, Mr. Abraham Lincoln (an Attorney) answered 
the banker 's argument that the beneficiary people of the posterity could not be trusted with their 
Constitutional powers, the political and monetary system of free enterprise conceived by their 
Founding Fathers, by saying: 
"No men living are more worthy to be tru sted than those who toil up from poverty -­
none less inclined to take or touch aught which they have not hone stly earned. Let 
them beware of sur rendering a political power which they alread y possess, and which 
if sur rendered , will surely be used to close the do or of adv ancement against such as 
they, and to fIX new di sabilities and burdens upon them, till all of liberty shall be 
lost. " 
In 18 65, just before the close of the Civil War, the military dictator (and illegitimately known as 
the President) , Mr. Abraham Lincoln declared his new monetary policy: 
"The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits 
needed to satisf y the spending power of the Government and the buying power of 
consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved 
immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of 
humanity .... The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme 
prerogative of government, but it is the governments' greatest opportunit y." 
Had this been implemented, it would have ushered in a worldwide economic renewal. 
Unfortunately, a few weeks after its introduction, Mr. Abraham Lincoln was assass inated 
because he defied the bankers in proposi ng to print interest free money to pay the war debt. 
Thus, the government continued to operate fully under the authority of private international law 
dictated by the Creditor. 
Si nce the Commander-in-Chief, Mr. Abraham Lincoln, was assass inated before he could 
complete plans for reinstating Constitutional agency government in the So uthern St ates of the 
Union and end the martial rule by executive order, the 14 th Amendment to the Constitution has 
further created a "new citizenship " or "status" for their expanded jurisdiction . Laws for the 
District of Columbia were propose d and passed by the military agency Congress in 18 71, the 
District of Columbia being incorporated as a private, foreign corporation by The District of 
Columbia Organic Act of 1871, and all member St ates of the Union were apparently reformed 
as franch isees or pol itical subdivisions (see Dyett v. Turner, [1968] 439 Pacific Reporters, 2d 
Se ries, 266, 267 ; and Utah v. Phillips [1975] 540 Pacific Reporter, 2d Se ries 936, 94 1 -942) of 
the corporation known as the UNITED STATES , hence creating a new military social construct, 
formerly known as the social compact of the Se veral St ates of the Union. What remained of the 
former agency government of the repUblican form of the social compact was the private side 
under the rule of the banker' s, solely for their absolute and express benefit. 
The first attempt by the military Congress under the new military social construct to define 
citizenship was in 18 66 in the passa ge of the Civil Rights Act (Revised St atutes section 19 92, 8 
REDEM PTIO N MANUA L - FO UR POIN T FIVE ED ITION 130 

United St ates Code Annotated section 1). The act provided that: 
"All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign powe r are 
declared to be citizens of the United States. " 
And this in tum was followed in 18 68 by the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, United 
St ates Code Annotated. Sa id Article of Amendment, the XIV, declaring: 
"A ll persons born or naturalized in the United Stat es, and subject to the 
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they 
resi de." 
At this period of time, the only people in the United St ates who were under the jurisdiction of 
the private bifurcated government of the assumed ten miles square of Washington, D.C., were 
the government employees, those within the territories owned by the United St ates and now the 
former slaves. The former Ci tizens of the Se veral Southern St ates of the Union, now 
"captured, " became 14 th Amendment United St ates £itizens, the only remainder of people 
operating within the military social construct or the alleged Creditors who could still invoke the 
power over agency government through the original jurisdiction of the Republican form of 
government, as established by the social compact of the United States Constitution as the 
holders in due course of each and every private right, privilege and immunity, if the need 
became necessa ry, concerning any possi ble attempt by the new military social construct to act 
arbitrarily, in any way concerning the servicing of the alleged debt due. 
A new 13 th Amendment was enacted December 18 , 18 65 . The 14 th Amendment was enacted 
July 28, 18 68. Bo th Amendments were illicitly ratified by non-elected Representatives and 
Se nators under Martial Law in each and every military enforced So uthern State legis lature, put 
into place by the U.S. Mili tary by direct order of the Commander-In-Chief, through force, over 
the conquered territory and under Martial Law. No such State could ever obtain its freedom 
from the new federal social military rule by ratifying these new amendments as misrepresented 
to the people by the federal system. They were told that the troops of aggressi on would be 
removed from such territories and cessa tion of hostilities would occur once these amendments 
were ratified. Any contract entered under threat, duress, or coercion is null and void. According 
to the Rule of War (Martial Law), once Martial Law is lifted all laws, rules, regulations created 
or promulgated during the hostilit ies are null and void and the parties return to the "status quo" 
before such hostilities broke out between the parties . But then, the Constitution was not even in 
effect following sine die and the proclamation of martial law. It is apparent that due to the fact 
that the national emergency has never been lifted or proclaimed to be over, that the so-called 
military social construct known as the United St ates is still in power under the rules of Martial 
Law by and through Executive Orders of the Commander-In-Chief, caused of necessity by sine 
die . 
The 14 th Amendment brought the freed slave s, whose previous owners were private plantation 
landowners, and transferred those slaves under subje ction of the new military social constructed 
government, the assumed ten miles square jurisdiction of the City of Washington and/or Dist rict 
of Columbia. And it offered its protection to those who would choose to become its 
REDEMP TION MA N UAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 13 1 

subje cts .. .i n exchange for their freedom and/or sovereignty. 
The 14 th Amendment is a good example of the "give-a-little, take a lot" strategy that is often 
used, a sugar coating to a bitter pill. So vereign People, who had assumed themselves to be 
among the powers of Earth, had created a social compact (a government) to guarantee 
themselves their rights. They secured these rights under this social compact as birthrights for 
their posterity (Ci tizens). In contrast, the federal government created fourteenth amendment 
£itizenship to guarantee its power over the former Citizens by reducing them to the standing of 
its newly created £itizens . It seems to be taking £itizens under its protection, but at the price of 
servitude . Sovereigns may choose to become subje cts; free men and women to become vas sals. 
This amendment has always been controversia l. Many people over the years have questioned the 
amount of power it vests in the federal government. Some have even questioned its validity. On 
one occasion Judge Ellett of the Utah Supreme Court as above referenced, remarked: 
"I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its faculties, could honestly 
hold that the amendment was properly approved and adopted." State v. Phillips, 
Pacific Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 540, Page 941, 942 (1975) 
However, the most important fact about this amendment is that, although it created a new class 
of £itizen, it did not have any effect on Sovereign People . Both classes still exist: When the 
Constitution was adopted, the People of the United St ates were the Citizens of the several St ates 
for whom and for whose posterity the government was establi shed . Each of them was a Citizen 
by birthright in the State of Birth to which United States was created to protect from foreign 
powers at the adoption of the Constitution by the Several St ates of the Union and to make 
Uniform such protection among the St ates, and all free people thereafter born within one of the 
several St ates became by birth Citizens of the compact party St ate of The United States of 
America. But we know that this is not true from research in the law of contract. Anyone not 
signatory to the social compact or directly related as the posterity thereto, is an alien to the 
compact and is only allowed to assume whatever right out of neces sity to the compact to keep 
the peace until all power is vested in order to secure to the members such blessi ngs unto 
themselves or their posterity as are necessary or opportunistic as the need may arise from time to 
time ... to preserve their Freedom ! 
Both classes of Cit izenl£itizen no longer exist except by the need of neces sity, as may or may 
not be claimed by any particular member of the current military social construct. It's your right 
of expatriation and repatriation to emerge into a social compact to which you become signatory 
to, to become a So vereign People, while it's a privilege to be a fourteenth amendment £itizen, 
and most importantly, it's up to you to determine which one you are, or which one you choose to 
be. Just remember that you "pay" for a privilege, whereas a right carries no obliga tion. This is at 
the heart of your public Declaration of Independence to a candid world by and through such 
social compact created to recognize your Sov ereign birthright, to assume among the powers of 
Earth, recognized by the laws of Nature and Nature' s Creator to which you are entitled, to 
emerge into the Sove reign People you were created to be and which are recognized and 
protected within the Universal and/or International Public Order. 
REDEM PTIO N MANUA L - FO UR POINT FIVE ED IT ION 132 

TWO GOVERNMENTS, TWO FLA GS : 
THE CORP ORATE STATE 
Once the smoke settled after the Civil War, European international bankers arrived in town. In 
18 71, the default again loomed and bankruptcy was imminent. So, in 18 72, the ten miles square 
Dist rict of Columbia was incorporated in England. A loophole was discovered in the 
Constitution by cunning attorneys in league with the international bankers . They realized that a 
separate nation by the same name exist ed that Congress had created in Article I, Se ction 8, 
Clause 17. 
The Congress shall have power : 
To exercise exclusive legis lation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not 
exceeding ten square mile s) as may, by cessi on of particular St ates, and the acceptance 
of Congress, become the seat of government of the United St ates, and to exercise like 
authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legisla ture of the state in which 
the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazine s, arsenals, dock yards, and other 
needful buildings ; -And 
To make all laws which shall be necessa ry and proper for carrying into execution the 
foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of 
the United St ates, or in any department or officer thereof. 
This "United St ates " is a Military Legi slative "Democracy" within the former Constitutional 
Republican government, and is known as the Federal United States. It has exclusive, unlimited 
rule over its Subje cts whether or not such Military allow one to call oneself a Citizen or not. In 
the eyes of the Mili tary construct, such people are solely resident aliens and all others are non­
resident aliens of the Dist rict of Colombia, the territories and enclaves (Guam, Midway Islands, 
Wake Island, Puerto Rico, etc.). Anyone who is a citizen by way of the 14 th Amendment 
(naturalized Citizen s) has only one sole privilege in the military construct and that is the right to 
vote, period. 
Both United St ates formerly exist ed side by side in the same United St ates in Congress 
Asse mbled that rules in both the former social compact and the military construct. One "United 
St ates," the Republican form of government of fifty Several St ates of the Union, has the "stars 
and stripes" as its flag, but without fringe on it. The Federal United St ates' flag is the stars and 
stripes with a yellow fringe, seen in all courts. The abbreviations of the St ates of the Continental 
United St ates are, with or without the zip codes, Ala., Alas ., Ariz., Ark., Cal., etc. The 
abbreviations of the States under the jurisdiction of the Federal United St ates after the Civil War, 
the Legi slative Democracy, are AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, etc. (without any periods). After the Civil 
War even the designa ted abbreviation of the District of Columbia changed from Distr. of Col., to 
DC. to inform those who might be awake concerning the changing of the guard, over the old 
social compact and the new military construct. 
The international bankers and the Military Congress conjured up this bit of mischief and passed 
REDEM PTION MANUAL - FOU R POINT FIVE EDITION 133 

it into law. But whose law? Congress broke faith with "We the People and their Posterity" long 
before the incorporation of 18 71. Congress sold them out when they finished the newly formed 
military private corporation and made it the government of the District of Columbia. They used 
the non-existent, so-called Constitution, under Military Dictatorship to declare such power 
through the 14 th Amendment, as their by-laws therefore taking their authority not under the 
Constitution but taking their authority over the Constitution. They copyrighted not only the 
Constitution, but also any and all related names such as, THE UNITED STATES , U.S. THE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USA as their own. This is the final blow to the original 
Constitution as it related to the post erity of the signatories of the soci al compact known as the 
United States for The United States of Amer ica. " Hence forth, the UNITED STATES and 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has been governed entirely by private corporate law, dictated 
by the bankers as the fiscal agent for the Creditors. 
The "A ct to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, " Se ction 34 of the Forty­
First Congress of the United State s, Ses sion III, Chapter 61 and 62, enacted February 21, 18 71, 
states that: 
"The UNITED ST ATES OF AMERICA is a corporation, whose jurisdiction is 
applicable only in the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia 
and to whatever properties are legally titled to the UNITED STATES , by its 
registration in the corporate County, St ate, and Federal governments that are under 
military power of the UNITED STATES and its creditors." 
Under this provision, the Military Congress of the UNITED STATES had obtained the power 
to pass Private International Law for application within the federal District of Columbia. All 
St ates of the Union, adopted under Military Order, created new, legis lative "conditions" and 
"codified" their laws by copyright under federal mandate. St ate "codes" were unlawfully 
adopted, despite their origin as instruments of a So vereign People. However, We the People 
remain So vereign within the framework of International Public Order if we choose to emerge 
out of such Military Social Construct by creating a new Social Compact according to the 
principals of Universal and/or International Law to replace that which, by sine die, no longer 
exists for our benefit or that of our posterity. 
The private Military copyrighted UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28, 3002(15)(A), basica lly 
reiterates that the UNITED ST ATES is a corporation. What was not said in 1871, but was 
implicit, was what is plainly stated at Title 28, 3002(15)(3) : That all departments of the 
UNITED STATES CORPORATION are part of the corporation. Title 28, UNITED ST ATES 
CODE, is Copyrighted, per Private International Law. Indeed, the UNITED STATES 
CODE, in its entirety, is Copyrighted Private International Law, and appli cable only in the 
District of Columbi a. 
This incorporation was first reported by Gary W. Phillips, whose career with the Immigration 
and Naturalization Se rvice began in 1956. He was the INS director at Se a Tac Airport for 20 
years and bega n challenging the income tax in 1985 (The Idaho Obs erver, March, 2000) . After 
nearly 40 years of government service, Phillips was forced to flee his alleged country to protect 
his life after exposi ng the facts of the ille gality of the federal government's criminal income tax 
REDEMP TIO N MANUAL - FO UR POIN T FIVE ED ITION 134 

collection scam --facts that are becoming well-known among informed people throughout the 
so-called Military So cial Construct. 
Where did the Cong ress find the authority in the Constitution to reconstitute any part of the 
united St ates as a corporation? Quite simply, the 17 91 Constitution was set aside to make room 
for the corporation under the Law of Necess ity created by sine die. Would this Act benefit the 
Republican form of government? No -the private , corporate bottom line is profit. The 
municipal , public bottom line is service. To replace the former service-oriented form of 
government with a profit-oriented form of military government, without any public knowledge 
or consent of the facts foisted upon the people, can only be described as treason, not only against 
the former social compact, but in respect to International Law, as well. This is clearly again st 
the orderly peace and dignity of International Public Order. 
A few superficial changes by attorneys were made to the original Constitution and it was no 
longer the real thing. The Military Congress did not change the name of the document so they 
could claim to be reading from the Constitution. They merely changed it from the Const itution 
for The United St ates of America to the CONS TITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF 
AMERICA. They changed the "for" to "or " and capitalized all the letters. All of a sudden we 
had two Constitutions, the original for show and the revision for actual use. 
The Act of 18 71 provided a government for the Dist rict of Columbia and created a corporation 
entitled the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, whose jurisdiction extends only over corporate 
entities created by the municipal corporation and are operative only in the Dist rict of Columbia. 
The City of Washington, as the Dist rict of Columbia is the capitol of the District of Columbia, 
not the United St ates of America, and all laws pas sed within the District of Columbia, are 
applicable and enforceable only in the District of Columbia and its possess ions. 
The St ates of the Republican form of government are not posses sions of the Dist rict of 
Columbia. Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam are posses sions of the Dist rict of 
Columbia, as well as property legally titled to the UNITED STATES by states and counties . But 
the former Republican governments, of the Se veral St ates of the Union, are under Military 
Dictatorship operating under national emergency due to sine die. 
The UNITED STATES CODE, in totality, was put together in the District of Columbia as 
Copyrighted Private International Law and is applicable only in the District of Columbia and 
any other jurisdiction within the purview of its Mili tary Dictatorship. By their own rules of 
jurisdiction, the UNITED STATES attorneys have no business prosecuting anyone outside of 
the District of Columbia or Federal territories. The military construct of federal district courts 
has no venue outside of the District of Columbia and, therefore, has no jurisdiction outside of the 
District of Columbia and its possess ions . The Mili tary Congress cannot pass a law that is 
applicable in the several St ates of the Republic than otherwise outside of the presumed 
emergency operating under the Law of Necessity created by congressio nal sine die . 
If all the laws passed in the District of Columbia are Private International Law, including all of 
the UNITED STAT ES CODE and the statutes at large and/or revised statutes passe d after 
18 71, and are applicable and enforceable only in the District of Columbia, then how could they 
REDEM PTION MANUAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED IT ION 135 

have become the law of the land? Because, not knowing better, we the People allowed it. We 
have allowed agents of foreign countries and/or enterprises to build an illega l corporation that 
has systematically corrupted every state, county and city in this nation. It has corrupted the 
status and standing of all people, whether or not connected to the former social compact of The 
United St ates of America, the Military Social Construct of the UNITED STATES or just aliens 
in respect to the International Public Order. The only way that a UNITED STATES DISTRICT 
COURT can have jurisdiction over a Sovereign is if the latter volunteers to become a subje ct of 
the jurisdiction or fails to declare his independence as a Sovereign within a social compact 
according to the principals of International Public Order. 
This corporation has created dozens of agencies, the I.R. S., F.B.I., D.E.A. , and the B. A.T.F. , to 
name a few, which employ thousands of agents who receive excellent salaries and benefits for 
betraying their friends and families while enforcing the private edicts of the so-called Congress. 
The men and women of Congress smile, speak softly, and then direct their illega l agencies to 
destroy those who do not fully conform to their wishes, striking fear into the hearts of those who 
do. Kidnapping and conspiracy are involved in every arrest and convi ction by federal 
author ities out side of the District of Columbia, by and through Milita ry Edicts executed via the 
Executive Orders of the Commander-I n-C hief under the Law of Necessity created by sine die. 
The question now leads to whether their duly elected public (PRIV ATE) officials swear an oath 
to uphold the Constitution for The United St ates of America, the Republican form of 
government within which the posterity to the original signatories who created such social 
compact birthrights are protected by a service-oriented government, or swear an oath to the 
CONS TITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the profit-oriented corporation? 
The question is answered by those who study the circumstances of present day conditions 
created by historical facts which reflect the outcome of future benefits of safety, liberty, and the 
pursuit of happiness to all who care for themselves and their posterity as a So ciety of Sovereign 
People of Earth who wish to remain such and wish to pass such Sovereignty to their posterity in 
the interest of peace and International Public Order. 
It appears by the Milita ry So cial Construct' s actions, that most government employees, 
knowingly or unknowingly, have sworn an oath to the corporate UNITED STATES . It is taught 
to the People by this Milita ry Social Construct, that it is our duty, as the People who elected 
them into office, to demand accountability from our assumed "public " officials and to confront 
them as to where their loyalties lie . Is it with the corrupt, treasonous corporation that is 
controlled by foreign agents from within and without, or is it with the reinstitution of the 
posterities ' Const itutional Republican form of government, The United St ates of America, and 
the social compact party St ates created thereby in Union with her Citizen s? 
An articulate defender of a conservative monetary policy, so-called President, Mr. James A. 
Garfield, urged the resumption of specie payments and the payment of government debts . He 
said, "W hoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all 
industry and commer ce." In his Inaugural Address in 1881, Garfield said : 
"The chief duty of the National Government in conn ection with the currenc y of the 
count ry is to coin money and declare its value. Grave do ubts have been entertained 
whether Congress is authori zed by the Constitution to make any form of paper mone y 
REDEM PTION MANUAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 136 

legal tender. The present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the 
necessi ties of war; but such paper shoul d depend for its value and cur renc y upon its 
con venience in use and its prompt redem ption in coin at the will of the holder, and 
not upon its compulsory circulation. These not es are not money, but promises to pay 
money. If the holders demand it, the promise shoul d be kept. " 
The so-called President, Mr. James A. Garfield was assassinated after only two hundred days 
in office, 80 days after being shot by a attorney, ostensibly because he was upset about not 
receiving an ambas sadorial posting to France. 
In 1909, default loomed once again. The so-called u.s. government asked the Crown of 
England for an extension of time . This extension was granted for another 20 years on several 
condition s. One of the conditions was that the United St ates to permit the creditors to establish a 
new national bank. The bankers moved deeper into the new military social construct by the 
establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913 and the IRS to collect the interest on their 
loans made to the UNITED STATES . The 17th Amendment, enacted May 31, 1913, was the 
condition for the extension of time which took away the St ates' rights to appoint members 
directly from its legisla tures to serve in the Senate of the United St ates, thereby destroying the 
last vestige of repUblican so-called government. The 16th and 17th Amendment further 
reduced the States ' power. The UNITED STATES adopted the mercantile system of ancient 
Babylonia. 
With the pass age of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 , the UNITED STATES was firmly lashed 
to the yoke, so that a small number of very rich men have been able to put upon all people a 
yoke little better than involuntary slavery itself. That yoke inevitably grows heavier with ever­
compounding interest, and totals over $20 trillion of debt allegedly owed by all walks of life 
today ($80,000 per man/woman/chil d). This vast accumulation of wealth concentrates 
immense power and desp otic economic domination in the hands of the few central bankers 
"w ho are able to govern credit and its allotment, for this reason supplying, so to speak, the 
life-blood to the entire economic body, and grasping, as it were, in their hands the very 
soul of the economy so that no one dare breathe against their will." A worldwide tyranny is 
gradually being imposed, hidden to most, by the Money Kings . 
THE FIRST WORLD WAR 
In 19 17, the people were drafted into the First World War. President Woodrow Wilson had to 
find a way to persuade the people to go along with an intervention in another of Europe's wars. 
Although restrained to be neutral in the deadly conflict by the Neutrality Act, he sent the Navy to 
shepherd Briti sh convoys across the Atlantic. German U-boat commanders did not take the bait 
and avoided contact with the U.S. destroyers. To force the iss ue, a U.S. naval ship deliberately 
sailed into the midst of a battle between British and German naval fleets and was sunk. But 
when the truth was learned, Wilson had to find another way. 
The Lusitania was a speedy warship refitted by the British as a passe nger liner. Unknown to its 
REDEM PTION MA NUA L - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 137 

passe ngers, the Lusitania was carrying a huge cargo of military equipment and munitions in 
violation of the US Neutrality Act. The Germans knew that and tried to warn the pas sengers by 
placing advertisements in prominent U.S. newspapers. The U.S. St ate Department ordered all of 
the newspapers to refuse the ad Only one newspaper, in Des Moine s, Iowa, bravely published 
the information. To ensure a successf ul provocation, the Lusitania was ordered to sail at 75% 
speed using only three of its four powerful engines . Then the naval escort was ordered away, 
leaving the Lusitania vulnerable as it entered the war zone. The first torpedo hit the explosive 
cargo and blew the bottom out of the Lusitania. It sank in only 18 minutes . 12 6 innocent civilians 
died . Wilson now had his provocation to rally people ignorant of the true facts behind the "War 
to End All Wars" (WWI). Deception personified . 
The U.S. participation in WWI exacerbated the national debt so that it became impo ssible for us 
to pay it off in 19 29. Wasn't that a nice coin cidence? It also enhanced the War Powers Act that 
the illegitimate President, Mr. Abraham Lincoln, by Executive Order (as Commander-In-Chief) 
put in place during his Presid ency. This War Powers Act was re-enforced and the Trading 
with the Enemy Act of 1917 was pas sed to define, regulate, and punish those who were trading 
with enemie s, and were then required by that act to be licensed by the government to do 
business, any busines s. (This will become more important later on .) 
THE GREAT DEPR ES SION : 
FROM SO VEREIGNTY TO SER VITUDE 
We all know what happened in 19 29. This was the year of the stock market crash and the 
beginning of The Great Depression. The stock market crash moved billions of dollars from the 
people to the banks . This also removed cash from circulation for the people 's use. Those who 
still possesse d any cash, invest ed in high interest yielding Treasury Bonds driven higher by 
increased demand. As a result, even more cash was removed from circulation in the general 
public for private use to the point where there was not enough cash left in circulation to buy the 
goods being produced even for the neces sities of life. Production came to a halt as excess 
inventory overwhelmed the market. There were more products on the market than there was 
cash to buy them. Prices plummeted and industries plunged into bankruptcy, throwing millions 
of people out of work. Foreclosures on homes, factories, businesses and farms rose to the highest 
level in history under the so-called new Milit ary Social Construct of the UNITED STATES . A 
mere dime was literally salvation to many families now living on the street. Millions of people 
lost everything they had, keeping only the clothes on their backs. 
In Europe, the International Bankers in 19 30 declared several social compact so-called nations 
bankrupt, including the United St ates. In 19 33, immediately after Franklin Delano Roose velt 
took office, his first act as the ille gitimate Preside nt, was to publicly declare the United St ates 
bank holiday by Executive Order (as Commander-In-Chief of the present Military Construct). 
He further went on to iss ue his so-called Presidential Executive Order on March 5th, 19 33 that 
all United States Citizens must turn in all their gold in return for Federal Reserve Notes. This 
Law was pas sed by Congress on June 5, 19 33. 
All Walks of Life turned in all their gold at that time . The gold represented the hard earned fruits 
REDEMP TIO N MANUAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITIO N 138 

of their labors. Why? Were we United St ates Citizen s? No. We were still a sovereign people 
until that time. We just thought that we were required to turn in all our gold. Only those people 
living in Washington, D.C., and the 14 th Amendment £itizens were so required. As sovereigns, 
we were not under the jurisdiction of the United St ates of America, which incorporated in 1871-
18 72. 
When we turned in our gold, we just volunteered to be citizens of the jurisdiction and all their 
laws of the assumed ten miles square of the City of Washington, District of Columbia, UNITED 
STATES , and/or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, whichever you prefer to recognize as 
the true desig nation of such Military Social Construct then or now. The people became captured 
by the misrepresentation of the status of the 14 th Amendment as £itizens. Our birth records 
become certificate s, and thereby the title to our bodie s. They were registered at the Department 
of Commercial within their Bureau of Cen sus. This title to our bodies, all of our property and all 
of our future labor, was pledged to the International Bankers as security for the alleged money 
owed in bankruptcy by the original signatories to the social compact known as the Se veral St ates 
of the Union, "The United St ates of America." This was done under the authority of commercial 
law (Babylonian law) by and through the beneficia l use of Title and/or evidence of Title. The 
People were not in bankruptcy. Only the Corporate UNITED STATES was in bankruptcy, which 
had taken upon itself the debts of the prior social compact for certain power, pr ivileges and 
immunitie s. But with the U.S. Corporation holding the title (by and through the transfer of 
ownership via the definition of fungible goods) to your body and life, you are now used for 
collateral to secure their national debt through birth certificates (given by parents ignorantly and 
voluntarily through condition of Mind and misrepresentations of Registered Agents) to be 
entered into the Commercial Registry and pledged to the wants and needs of the Milita ry So cial 
Construct's duty to service the debt owed by others at your expense. This act, in commerce, gave 
title to your body by way of a "constructive" contract, but fraud vitiates all contracts . You may 
still exercise your unalienable birthrights, an assumed among the powers of Earth, for your 
separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature's Creator entitle you. 
Next, the government created an artificial 'person' with your given property name, a corporation, 
a fictitious entity to take its place in a virtual reality of contract law and corporations. By and 
through an adhesion contract via a newborn identification form with and attached ident-a-t ag 
number for commercial registration pu rposes, the government then made you, the real man or 
woman, responsible for that fictional entity, a fiduciary and surety for an artificial entity. Your 
artificial entity secured the National debt by and through your future performance of labor in 
exchange for the beneficia l interest units (FRNs) which would arise from the beneficial use of 
the notes is sued to you in exchange for your labor performed. This scheme allowed the Military 
Social Construct to service the debt obligati ons of the Military regime and through it you became 
a 14 th Amendment £itizen of the UNITED STATES with the bonded (by United St ates Bonds) 
right to vote once registered . Then when you became of lega l age of contractual consent you 
perfected the bonds by binding yourself to that status by registering to vote and giving general 
power of attorney to those elected to perform every act and deed in your stead as if physically 
present yourself. In other words, they got you to think and act as though you really were that 
fictional entity for all intents and purposes as the fiduciary surety. You agreed by your action or 
failure to act. YOU adhered to a contract offer because you thought or acted as though you were 
the receiver of the offer. In doing so, YOU were presumed to have ACCEPTED THE 
REDEM PTION MANUA L - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 139 

CO NTRACT by general acquiescence to all the terms and conditions of the status of surety for 
the fiction (created by the military social construct) once you had perfected the bond by binding 
yourself by becoming a registered voter. 
All licenses and all exist ing contracts are made between the UNITED STATES or THE STATE 
OF (whatever state of condition you live in) and your artificial entity. That fictitious entity binds 
you to the UNITED STATES and its sub-corporations because they have, through adhesion 
contracts as stated, made you, the real man or woman, fiduciary and responsible for that artificial 
entity. Of course, you voluntarily sign, and even request, all those contracts, don't you? It 
seems to be your name, although you probably never spell it all in capital letters as they do. 
They wish for you to think nothing of the derivativ es, variations or aberrations, perhaps just 
something they do to be clea r and error-free, respective to positive identification as most 
wrongfully think. All of these contracts you sign carry with it your agreement to obey and 
uphold all the military Executive Orders Laws, Rules and Regulations passed by the so-called 
President (Commander-In-Chief), the Congress of the UNITED STATES COR PORATION and 
THE STATE OF . They will be enforced again st you until you decide to assume 
among the powers of Earth, to which the Laws of Nature and Nature's Creator entitle you, 
instead of the laws of Man to which you have no underlying nexus via social compact with such 
agencies of government of whatever construct to protect your birthrights to Life, Liberty and the 
Pursuit of Happiness. 
From that day forward, We the People, once upon a time sovereigns who created government for 
our convenience and welfare, could never own property in allodium because the new State of the 
No Union, now had posses sion of it all. In 19 64, the St ate obtained title to all private property. 
You can only "rent" homes that you believe you own by paying taxes. You only have a 
certificate of title to the car you think you own, and you continue to drive it because of your 
"yearly" fee of registration is assumed to be paid . The St ate owns the true title to our homes, our 
cars, to everything we thought or think we own. You married the State through your voter' s 
registration card, marriage license therefore allowing your children to become wards of the St ate 
and by regis tering your children via the birth certificate, whereby the commer cial vehicle was 
created for commerce, as property of the St ate. All of this was pledged, including all the fruits 
of your future labor, to the bankers as security against the so-called national debt and was placed 
in the posses sion of the Secretary of State of each state as an agent for the Trustee of the 
Bankruptcy, the U.S. Se cretary of Treasury. Not knowing the rules of the game you went direc tly 
to jail, you coul d not pass GO and you coul d not collect $2001 
COWS IN THE PASTURE OR FREED OM : 
THE HIDDEN CHOICE 
The way out of this is dilemma can be very complex . In fact, its complexity was intentional. 
Roosevelt had violated the law by placing all people into involuntary servitude without their true 
consent. Congressman Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges against the Federal 
Reserve and the Se cretary of the Treasury and was coming dangerously close to calling for 
impeachment of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Two months AFTER the Executive Order, on June 5, 
REDEM PTIO N MANUAL - FO UR POIN T FIVE ED ITION 140 

1933, the Senate and House of Representatives, 73d Congres s, 1st Se ssion, at 4: 30 pm 
approved House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192: Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard 
And Abrogate The Gold Clause, Joint Resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and 
currencies of the United St ates. This is the Act which formally declared the bankruptcy of the 
UNITED STATES . 
F.D.R., by Executive Order as the Commander-In-Chief of the military social construct, declared 
all people outside the militarily federalized territories to be the enemy by illega lly altering the 
Trading with the Enemy Act of 1861, revised 1918. 
The creation of Federal Zone £itizenship was strengthened when you were told to apply for a 
So cial Sec urity number after 1935. The so-called benefits offered by this contract were hurriedly 
and voluntarily entered into when the Social Sec urity Act was signed into law because, once 
again, the true facts regarding the outcome of accepting such benefits were withheld due to 
misrepresentation and the lack of full disclosure. Further, contracts were to be entered into and 
license to be applied for-all voluntary actions. We, unknowingly, were entering into lifelong 
servitude to receive the benefits of the Lord of the Manor, the so-called Military Soc ial Construct 
Act, for and under the Order of the Money Kings and the Crown of England as the Exchequer of 
the Vatican Treasury. We had desce nded into feudal vassalage not seen since before the signing 
of the Magna Charta (1215 ) without even recognizing it. 
The so-called President, Mr. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, then called all the Governors into 
Washington D. e. for a conference. This was the beginning of the St ates losi ng the remainder of 
any semblance of their former So vereignty. It was not until 1944 that the Corporate States lost 
all of their power over the Corporate United States with the Buck Act. With this Act, the 
states became, essentially, 14 th Amendment £itizens as well. This Buck Act completed the 
destruction of the corporate states having any power to protect themselves against usurpation by 
the Military Social Construct known as the United St ates Government. The corporate states now 
fell under the jurisdiction of Washington, D.C., as mere supervise d units under the so-called 
federal system. 
Strangely enough, on October 28, 1977, H.J.R.-192 was quietly repealed by public law 95-
147. 91 Stat. 1227. "The jo int resolution entitled 'Jo int resolution to assure uniform value to 
the coins and currencies of the United States' approved June 5, 1933 (31 U.S.C. 463), shall not 
apply to obligations issued on or after the date of enactment of this section." 
The reason for the repeal of HJR-192 is somewhat obscure. After 44 years of unchallenged 
implementation, this public policy was clearly establi shed by custom, usage and participation in 
the credit system by the so-called American public. Those of us operating on the privilege of 
limited liability, via the public credit, are still bound unless such liability is discharged back to 
the original source of the debt generated by the issua nce of money of account under the 
copyrighted military script known as Federal Reserve Notes. 
The adoption of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.e.e.) by all entities allowed them to use the 
desig nated copyrighted name of each and every St ate in 19 64, along with a number of other like 
laws and Acts, were incorporated within the military social construct of the sub-multi­
jurisdictional franchised venues in the military social construct known as the United St ates . This 
REDEM PTION MANUAL - FO UR POIN T FIVE ED IT ION 14 1 

made the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) the Supreme Law of the Land appertaining to 
Secured Transactions and even Documents of Title, though the U.C.C. speaks in hidden terms 
concerning Documents of Title. 
COURTS SHIFT FR OM COMMON LAW TO 
EQUTY AND ADMIRALTY COUR TS 
Under the social contract known as the Constitution, based on Common Law (common between 
those signa tory, their posterity and their Agents of Trust, Profit and Honor), the Republican form 
of Government of the Continental United St ates provides for legal cases : at Law, in Equity , and 
in Admiralty. 
(1) Law is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense as it 
operates over the creators of such social compact. It is the will of the majority, which 
created such compact, the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the 
substitution of a common force for individual forces in a reality were such individual 
power is limited by Unity, to do only what the individual forces have a natural and 
lawful right to do but in harmony with each member of the whole to secure the benefits 
of the one and at the same time for all signatory thereto: to protect themselves, their 
posterity, their liberties, and properties ; to maintain the right of each, and to cause 
justice to reign over all willing to declare to each such pledge as necessary to accept and 
carry out the obligations of such compact. Si nce people, singularly, cannot lawfully use 
force against any people s, liberty, or property of another people in most cases due to 
circumstances naturally lacking any contractual foundational societal nexus so-to-speak, 
the common force-for the same reason-cannot lawfully be used to destroy the people, 
liberty, or property of any people or groups of people s. Law allows you to do anything 
you want to, as long as you don't infringe upon the life, liberty or property of anyone 
else. Law does not compel performance with a remedy for breach of the International 
Public Order, whether locally or otherwise. 
Today's so-called laws (ordinances, statutes, acts, regulations , orders, precepts, etc.) are often 
erroneously perceived as law, but just because something is called a "law" does not necessa rily 
make it law. [There is a difference between "l egal " and "l awful." Anything government does is 
assumed legal , but it may not be expressly lawful.] 
(2) Equity is the jurisdiction of compelled performance (for any contract you are a 
party to) and is based on what is fair in a particular situation. The term "e quity" 
denotes the spirit and habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate 
the intercourse of men with men. Connected by agreement and obligations to perform 
accordingly, as governed amongst those who are signatory or otherwise by such general 
acquiescence among them until such time as circumstances may arise to separate the 
bands which either united them or otherwise which have lead them to accept such 
circumstances for whatever reason. You have no rights other than what is specif ied in 
your contract, which is governed by the foundational social compact. Equity has no 
REDEM PTIO N MANUA L - FO UR POINT FIVE EDITION 142 

criminal aspects to it. 
(3) Admiralty is compelled performance plus a criminal penalty, a civil contract with a 
criminal penalty outside of any social compact guaranteeing any pr ivileges or 
immunities from such application of Admiralty jurisdiction. 
By 1938 the gradual procedural merger between law and equity actions (i.e. , the same so-called 
courts had jurisdiction over legal, equitable, and admiralty matters) was recognized and 
accepted. The military social construct was bankrupt. It now was owned by its creditors (the 
international bankers) who controlled everything-the Congress, the Executive, the courts, all 
the St ates and their legis latures and executives, all the land, and all people through 
misrepresentation and an absolute fraud perpetrated from condition of mind. This was brought 
about by those exercising an unjust persuasion over all Walks of Life not only locally but upon a 
planetary scale as well. Everything was mortgaged in support to the so-called national debt. 
They had gone from being sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through 
the use of negotiable instruments to discharge people 's debts with limited liability, instead of 
paying people 's debts at common law with gold or silver coin according to the original mandate 
of the now non-existent Constitution of the social compact formally known as "The united St ates 
of America." 
A change in their system of law from public law to private commercial law was recognized by 
the Supreme Court of the United St ates in the Erie Railroad vs. Thompkins case of 1938. In 
the same year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the procedures of Equity. 
Prior to 19 38, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions were based upon public law-or that system of 
law that was allegedly controlled by the social compact's Constitutional limitation. Si nce 19 38, 
all U.S. Supreme Court decisi ons are based upon what is termed public policy. 
Public policy concerns commercial transactions made under the Negotiable Instrument's Law, 
which is a branch of the International Law Merchant. This has been codified into what is now 
known as the Uniform Commercial Code. This system of law was made uniform throughout the 
fifty franchise sub-states by the cunning of the Military Social Construct of the UNITED 
STATES in Congress Asse mbled. 
In offering grants of negotiable paper (Federal Reserve Notes), which the Milita ry Congress gave 
to the fifty sub-states of the former Union for education, highways, health, and other purposes, 
Congress bound all the former St ates of the Union into a commercial agreement with the Federal 
Military United St ates (as distinguished from the Continental United St ates). The fifty St ates 
accepted the "benefits" offered by the Federal Military United St ates as the consideration of a 
commercial agreement between the Federal United St ates and each of the corporate St ates. The 
corporate St ates were then obligated to obey the Congress of the Federal United St ates. They 
became supervised units of the military federal system and had to assume their portion of the 
equitable debts of the Federal United St ates to the international banking houses, for the credit 
loaned. The credit which each sub-state received, in the form of federal block grants, was 
predicated upon equitable paper. 
This system of negotia ble paper binds all corporate entities of government together in a vast 
REDEM PTION MA N UAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 143 

system of commercial agreements, has altered their court system from one under the Common 
Law to a Legi slative Article I Court, or Tribunal, system of commercial law. Those people 
brought before this court are held to the letter of every statute of government on the federal, 
state, county, or municipal levels unless they have exercised the REMEDY provided for them 
within that system of Commercial Law whereby, when forced to use a so-called "benefit " 
offered, or available, to them from the so-called government, they may reserve their former right, 
under the Common Law guarantee of same, to not be bound by any contract, or commercial 
agreement that they did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. But once this has 
been done according to International Public Order, such people are obliged to subje ct 
themselves to their former state if that do not emerge into any other political status freely 
determined by a people, according to the same International Public Order constituting modes 
of implementing the right of self-determination by these peoples into such a social compact for 
their safety, liberty, and the pursuit of their happiness. 
In 1976, the Military So cial Construct's "United States in Congress Ass embled" took away 
any semblance of law or justice left within their court system. All law today is now construed, 
constructed and made up by the judge as it happens before your very eyes. Common law has 
almost disappeared from the courts. They took away any control or authority anyone, whosoever, 
might, or could, have had over the court system. This has been well hidden from all of Walks 
of Life. 
Many of the people entering into such courts often wonder why and how the courts can simply 
override the laws that are paraded before them as extant and used by them in their paperwork to 
seek remedy to state a just claim of action for governmental abuse. It's very simple now that we 
know how they do it. They operate on the words 'c onstrue and construct ,' with unrestricted 
liberty per Senate bill 94-201 and 94-381. 
A simple word such as 'in' changed to 'a t' as in 'a t law ' or 'in law ' has a totally separate 
meaning. For example: If you are in the river, you are wet, you can swim, etc., but if you are at 
the river, you might enjo y a refreshing picnic , play base ball or run races . Se e the difference a 
simple word can make? The attorneys often change this word when they answer your motions ­
in addition to many others to direct the crossing over of their duty 'a t law ' in attornment owed to 
the Chamberlains of the Exchequer of the Treasury of the Vatican . 
It will pay you in dividends to read the answers of attorneys to your so-called paperwork. 
Compare what they say the case law says to the actual case law itself . You'l l discover that they 
have actually changed the words therein. You might say this would appear to be unlawful. No, 
not, according to the U.S. Code. 
As you see, they can now construe and construct any law or statute to mean whatever they decide 
it means for their benefit. You don't know any of this. You think they are railroading you in a 
kangaroo court. No, they are 'le gal ' in what they do . They usually follow the law to the letter; 
Their law, private law, the law of contract, which you know nothing about. This law is called 
contract law. 
REDEM PTIO N MA NUA L - FO UR POINT FIVE ED ITION 144 

A RE CENT EXAMPLE : 
COUNTIN G VOT ES DECL ARD IRRELEVANT 
BY THE SUPREME COURT 
In 19 99, I watched in utter amazement as the Supreme Court of the United St ates overturned the 
Florida State Supreme Court' s decision to proceed with a recount of the contested ballots and the 
Eleventh District' s Court decision to uphold the decision of the Florida court. In Orwellian 
doublespeak, Chief Justice Antonin Sca lia wrote on Saturday, December 9, 19 99: 
"The counting of the votes that are of questionable legality does, in my view, threaten 
irreparable harm to Bush, and to the country, by casting a cloud upon which he claims 
to be the legitimac y of his election. Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not 
a recipe for producing election results that have the public acceptance democratic 
s tabili ty requires. " 
It was a brazen and Orwellian declaration. What people who call themselves "American," who 
believe in democracy, could claim that something was wrong with counting votes "first? " What 
so-called American, who believes in democracy could declare one candidate the winner and 
protect him from "irreparable harm" if a vote count showed him not to be the winner, after all? 
Of course, it doesn't make any sense, unless you realize the foundation upon which Chief Justice 
Antonin Sca lia based his transparently partisan remarks. He doesn 't believe in democracy, he 
doesn 't even believe in republicanism. He is a militarist monarchist attorney and the Chief 
Chamberlain of the Exchequer of the Treasury of the Vatican in the U. S. Now don't get me 
wrong, because I believe that those who are not willing to exercise their Creator-Given 
Unalienable Birthrights to emerge out of slavery into Sovereignty are worthy of neither safety 
nor such liberty exercise d by those who have united to emerge into a social compact for the 
exercise of such safety and liberty. 
Chief Justice Antonin Sca lia revealed his true motivations when he spoke on the subject of 
capital punishment at the University of Chic ago (February 2002) . During his remarks, he stated: 
"The reaction of people of faith to this tendency of democracy to obscur e the divine authority 
behi nd government should not be resigned to it, but the resolution to combat it as effectivel y as 
possible ." 
("God's Justice and Ours .. . http://www.firstthings .c omlftis sues/ft020S/articles/scalia. html) 
Is it possi ble for Democracy to obscure Divine Authority behind government? Perhaps this helps 
shed some light on why Chief Justice Antonin Sca lia and the four other right-wing "Justices" 
could so easily subvert any election process and, through an act of divine intervention, usher the 
son onto the throne lost some eight years earlier by his father, George I. We are assuming that 
we are still independent sovereigns and freemen as declared by the Declaration of Independence 
and that the so-called Constitution is still in effect, or that such a document has ever had anything 
to do with all Walks of Life. Chief Justice Antonin Sca lia has no such illusion. History supports 
his position, sorry to say. 
Chief Justice Antonin Sca lia is an ideologue so accustomed to all Walks of Life and their 
REDEM PTION MA NUA L - FO UR POINT FIVE EDI TION 145 

willingness to continue to be subje cts that he does not even consider the ideal of a government 
of, by, and for the people. That ideal has remained as a useful fiction to be taught in Civics 
classes and mouthed by the politicians to continue to delude the youth of the people even when 
the people grow up and are repeatedly shown that the facts are absolutely opposite of what has 
been taught. Chief Justice Antonin Sca lia knows that we are mere chattel by presumption. Si nce 
we have not even discovered that our status as freemen or So vereign has been lost, through more 
than two hundred years of our assumed hist ory, much less withdrawn our implied consent to be 
subje cts, we are presumed to be subjects before the so-called courts and in the minds of people 
like Chief Justice Antonin Scalia. Due to the control of institutional centers of education, where 
we became brained washed in our adolescent years to believe in a system which no longer exists , 
even if we never had any nexus with that former system which was being taught, that our rights 
were secure by and through such former system of government. 
Chief Justice Antonin Sca lia speaks of civil dis obedience with contempt and quotes the Bible, 
"Y e must needs be sub je ct." We must, as mere servants of the ruling class, acquiesce to our 
divinely guided leaders. Who are we, as mere subje cts, to question those who make the laws and 
interpret them? After all, he says that "G overnment carries the sword as 't he minister of 
God,' to 'execute wrath ' upon the evildoer." No, he has not reverted to a justice of another 
time-WE have, by our ignorance and silence, acquiesced to a lower status reminiscent of 
another time . 
There you have it ! In his eyes, we are subje cts unworthy of honor, peace and justice. Somehow 
Chief Justice Antonin Sca lia 's statements seem like a long way from the Declaration of 
Independence in which so-called Americans stood before the world as So vereigns invested with 
certain unalienable rights, including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happine ss. After 
the American Revolution, the monarchies of Europe saw the Republican form of Democracy as 
an unnatural, ungodly, ideologic al threat, just as radical and dangerous as Communism was 
regarded by Western nations upon its inception. Just as the 1917 Communist Revolution in 
Russia spawned other revolutions around the world, the American Revolution provided an 
example and incentive for people all over the world to overthrow their European monarchies 
whether wrong or right. What has happened? When did we give up our natural, Creator-Given 
Unalienable Birthrights for just any system of government whether monarchial or otherwise? 
Our forefathers fought and won that war didn't they? NOT SO! 
VICE -ADMIRALTY COU RTS 
In English Law, Courts established in the Kings/Q ueen's posses sions beyond the seas had 
jurisdiction over maritime causes, including those relating to booty or prize. 
The United St ates of America is lawfully the posses sion of the English Crown per original 
commercial joint venture agreement between the colonies and the Crown, and the social compact 
under the Constitution, which brought all the state s (only) back under British ownership and rule. 
The people, however, had sovereign standing in law, independent to any connection to the St ates 
or the Crown under the Constitution. This fact necessi tated that the people be brought back, one 
REDEMP TIO N MANUAL - FOUR POIN T FIVE ED IT ION 146 

at a time, under British Rule. The commercial process was the method of choice in order to 
accomplish this task. First, via the 14 th Amendment and secondly, by and through the registration 
of our birth registries and property, and thirdly, via the voter registration pr ocess whereby those 
who regis tered to vote gave general power of attorney without restriction, reservation or 
limitation to act in their stead once in office, and without any recourse. All such courts in 
America are Vice-admiralty courts in the Crown's private commerce. Read the definition of 
"C ourts of Exchequer" (for the Treasury of the Vatican) as defined in the 3rd, 4th, or 5th 
Editions of Black 's Law Dictionary. Pay close attention to the term "fiction." 
"In English law. A very ancient court of record, set up by William the Conqueror as a part of 
the aul a Regis, and afterwards one of the four superior courts at Westminster. It was, however, 
inferior in rank to both the king' s bench and the common pleas . It was presided over by a chief 
baron and four puisne barons. It was originally the king 's treasury, and was charged with 
keeping the king 's accounts and collecting the royal revenues. But pleas between subject and 
subject were anciently heard there, until this was forbidden by the Articul a super Chartas, 
(1 290,) after which its jurisdiction as a court only extended to revenue cases arising out of the 
non-payment or withholding of debts to the crown. But the privilege of suing and being sued in 
this court was extended to the king 's accountants, and later, by the use of a convenient fiction 
to the effect that the plaintif f was the king 's debtor or accountant, the court was thrown open to 
all suitors in personal actions. The exchequer had formerly both an equity side and a common­
law side ... " 
'e mphasis added' 
REDEM PTION MANUAL - FO UR POINT FIVE ED IT ION 147